Reading the gameweek calendar, the player list and the fixture schedule from the FPL API.
Reading the gameweek calendar, the player list and the fixture schedule from the FPL API.
Reading the gameweek calendar, the player list and the fixture schedule from the FPL API.
Explore
Rise and fall pressure — and when it should be ignored.
The rule
This product never recommends a transfer to catch or dodge a price change. A tenth of a million is what a move is worth; the football question is worth points, and it is decided first.
No price has changed since the season opened. FPL publishes the pressure behind every price, and it is read here: 143 under pressure to rise, 347 under pressure to fall, and 38 prices are locked by FPL for now.
The market
FPL publishes the pressure for 609 of 609 players. Here, furthest along first: 20 of the 143 under pressure to rise, and 20 of the 347 under pressure to fall; a locked price is left out until FPL frees it.
Official · basis: bootstrap-static/ elements[] — each player’s listed price, ownership and transfers this gameweek; the progress toward a change, its hourly rate and FPL’s own projection for the next three changes · updated 3 min ago · confidence: high
Projection · basis: xPts for GW2 and the GW2-GW6 window. Built from FPL’s own published season data — the player list, the fixture list and the points table — read together as one snapshot of the 2026/27 season and its 38 gameweeks. Points are counted with FPL’s published values rather than with a copy of them. A player's rate of scoring, assisting and keeping clean sheets is pulled toward a fixed population of 279 players with a completed season, independent of which individual records this screen fetched, so a short record is not read as confidently as a long one. Everything FPL does not publish is at this product’s own stated default. Player rates come from the season totals FPL publishes on each player, which for 2026/27 are this season's and still in progress. Every player is projected from his full record of completed seasons, read for all 609 of them at once and shared by every screen. Those cohorts are the same for everybody, so what one player carries cannot move another player's figure. 279 of 609 players have appeared so far in 2026/27; the rest have no minutes yet and are projected from a price-and-position cohort prior instead. · updated 3 min ago · confidence: medium
A projection, not a result. It states the most likely outcome, and football regularly disagrees.
DEFARS£5.5m40.3% owned
55.6% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,268.
FPL’s projection: 56% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 75% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 94% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
111,521 in, 9,510 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 11.7 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDBRE£5.5m4.3% owned
44.6% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 2,144.
FPL’s projection: 46% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 77% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 109% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
86,980 in, 2,720 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.2 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDARS£6.5m9.5% owned
44.6% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,484.
FPL’s projection: 45% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 67% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 89% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
89,719 in, 6,729 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 12.4 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
DEFBRE£4.5m4.2% owned
38.7% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,647.
FPL’s projection: 40% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 64% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5), then 88% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
78,886 in, 2,919 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 10.9 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDARS£6.5m25.4% owned
36.9% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 816.
FPL’s projection: 37% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 49% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 61% of the way (FPL’s band 4 of 5).
75,970 in, 9,871 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 1.3 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
DEFBHA£4.5m2.6% owned
34.7% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 3,315.
FPL’s projection: 37% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 85% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5), then 134% of the way (FPL’s band 5 of 5).
72,900 in, 2,086 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 9.6 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
FWDARS£7.5m6.2% owned
28.9% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 929.
FPL’s projection: 29% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 43% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5), then 57% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
58,499 in, 6,653 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 8.2 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDEVE£6.5m3.9% owned
18.7% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 452.
FPL’s projection: 19% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 26% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 32% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
42,705 in, 4,702 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 11.9 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
DEFARS£5.5m5.1% owned
17.0% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 477.
FPL’s projection: 17% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 24% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 31% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
37,289 in, 4,444 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 7.3 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
DEFMCI£5.5m11.5% owned
16.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,026.
FPL’s projection: 17% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 32% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 47% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
41,985 in, 7,664 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 13.6 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDLIV£7.0m41.9% owned
14.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,268.
FPL’s projection: 15% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 34% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 52% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
46,055 in, 17,269 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 18.6 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
FWDCHE£7.5m64.0% owned
14.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 523.
FPL’s projection: 15% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 23% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 30% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
39,801 in, 11,973 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 18.6 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDBHA£6.0m0.9% owned
13.8% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 973.
FPL’s projection: 14% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 29% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 43% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
31,371 in, 1,998 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 9.9 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDMCI£7.5m8.5% owned
13.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 1,188.
FPL’s projection: 14% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 32% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 49% of the way (FPL’s band 3 of 5).
38,654 in, 10,571 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 15.5 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDEVE£6.0m16.0% owned
11.0% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 364.
FPL’s projection: 11% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 17% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 22% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
31,831 in, 9,506 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 15.2 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
DEFMCI£6.0m17.5% owned
10.6% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 943.
FPL’s projection: 11% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 25% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5), then 39% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
35,114 in, 11,085 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 18.0 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
FWDIPS£5.5m0.8% owned
9.9% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 521.
FPL’s projection: 10% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 18% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 25% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
22,603 in, 1,918 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.3 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
DEFHUL£4.0m1.3% owned
9.5% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 194.
FPL’s projection: 10% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 12% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 15% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5).
21,897 in, 3,727 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 6.9 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
FWDEVE£5.5m1.6% owned
9.3% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 405.
FPL’s projection: 10% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 16% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 21% of the way (FPL’s band 2 of 5).
21,862 in, 2,868 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 12.1 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
MIDHUL£4.5m3.3% owned
8.8% toward a riseMoving at FPL’s hourly rate of 313.
FPL’s projection: 9% of the way to a rise at the next change (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 14% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5), then 18% of the way (FPL’s band 1 of 5).
20,830 in, 4,018 out this gameweek.
Ignore it for the decision: this move is worth a tenth of a million. Whether he is worth holding is worth 0.2 xPts over GW2–GW6. Decide that first.
Your squad
No FPL team is connected, so there is no squad to read. A team id is public information — nothing here ever asks for your password.
Connect a team, or draft a squad, and each player in it appears here with what he cost, what he sells for, what he is listed at now and FPL’s pressure on his price. Connect a team
FPL’s rules on prices, as the rulebook reads them
Player purchase prices
You buy a player at his listed price, and that purchase price is remembered for as long as you own him.
The whole squad must fit inside 100.0m at the moment each transfer is made.
Player selling prices
If a player's price has fallen you take the fall in full. If it has risen, FPL keeps 50% of the profit.
The half you keep is rounded down to the nearest 0.1m, so a rise of 0.1m is worth nothing to you and a rise of 0.3m is worth the same as a rise of 0.2m.
Price changes
Player prices move during the season in steps of 0.1m as managers buy and sell them.
FPL publishes prices as whole numbers 10 times the value in millions, and does not publish the algorithm that decides when a price moves — this product therefore reports observed prices and never predicts a change as fact.
Why no row says a move matters
“This move matters to the decision” is raised for a player named in one of your open decision rooms — the transfers you are already weighing. The transfers screen weighs a swap by searching, and nothing here runs that search, so a move that screen would weigh but no room names reads as one to ignore for the decision: the football question first.